↗ OpenReview ↗ NeurIPS Homepage ↗ Chat
TL;DR#
Many real-world decisions are affected by people’s tendency to stick to their beliefs even when presented with contradictory evidence. This paper addresses the problem of detecting such bias in belief updating. The core issue is that beliefs are often unobservable; this challenges traditional approaches.
The researchers propose a novel method inspired by information design, involving the creation of signaling schemes and analysis of agents’ actions in response. They develop a computationally efficient algorithm to find optimal schemes that minimize the number of signals needed to detect bias. This algorithm is shown to be equally effective regardless of whether signals are sent sequentially or simultaneously. The study also explores the conditions under which bias can be detected using only a single signal.
Key Takeaways#
Why does it matter?#
This paper is crucial for researchers studying belief formation and information processing. It provides novel algorithms for detecting bias in belief updates, which has broad applications across various fields, including political science, economics, and social psychology. The research opens up new avenues for understanding disagreement and polarization, and for designing more effective methods for improving collective decision making. The geometric characterization of the problem offers valuable insights for designing more efficient algorithms.
Visual Insights#
This figure illustrates three scenarios for bias detection using a simplex representation of beliefs. The scenarios differ based on the value of τ (bias threshold) and the prior belief (μ0). In (a), a single sample suffices for bias detection. In (b), multiple samples are needed. In (c), bias detection is impossible.
Full paper#
