↗ OpenReview ↗ NeurIPS Homepage ↗ Chat
TL;DR#
Many machine learning tasks require proper credit attribution for data used, especially copyrighted material. Existing methods for data protection, such as differential privacy, often fall short in this context. They either restrict the use of copyrighted data too much or fail to guarantee the privacy of sensitive data.
This paper addresses this limitation by introducing new definitions of differential privacy that selectively weaken stability guarantees for a designated subset of data points. This allows for controlled use of these data points while guaranteeing that others have no significant influence on the algorithm’s output. The framework encompasses various stability notions, enhancing the expressive power for credit attribution. The expressive power of these principles is characterized in the PAC learning framework, showing their implications on learnability.
Key Takeaways#
Why does it matter?#
This paper is crucial for researchers working on machine learning algorithms, privacy, and copyright. It introduces novel notions of stability that enable learning while guaranteeing proper credit attribution, addressing a critical challenge in the field. The theoretical framework and results provide a foundation for developing more responsible and ethical AI systems. The proposed definitions extend well-studied notions of stability, which is important for future research.
Visual Insights#
The figure illustrates a Support Vector Machine (SVM) as an example of a counterfactual credit attribution mechanism. The SVM finds the maximum-margin hyperplane that separates data points. Only the support vectors (points closest to the hyperplane) determine the hyperplane’s position. Removing any non-support vector does not change the hyperplane; thus, they are not credited for influencing the model’s output.
Full paper#
