↗ OpenReview ↗ NeurIPS Homepage ↗ Chat
TL;DR#
Estimating probabilities involving interventions in causal models, especially Causal Bayesian Networks (CBNs), is challenging. Existing methods struggle with accurate calculations, particularly for formulas involving interventions and conditioning. Pearl’s autonomy assumption in CBNs, while intuitive, often leads to imprecise probability estimates.
This paper introduces a novel approach that leverages simple yet realistic independence assumptions to precisely estimate probabilities in CBNs. By assuming independence of mechanisms determining interventions, the researchers derive unique probability estimates for interventional formulas. Importantly, these estimates can be calculated using observational data, significantly reducing reliance on costly and often infeasible experiments. The paper also presents simplified formulas for counterfactual probabilities, enhancing the usability of causal inference techniques.
Key Takeaways#
Why does it matter?#
This paper significantly advances causal inference by uniquely estimating probabilities in Causal Bayesian Networks (CBNs), enabling analysis using observational data, and simplifying calculations for crucial counterfactual probabilities. This addresses a critical limitation of CBNs and opens avenues for practical applications in various fields.
Visual Insights#
This figure shows a simple Bayesian network with four binary variables. Variable U is an exogenous variable and its values determine the conditional probabilities of the other variables. X1 and X2 are endogenous variables. The variable Y is a child of both X1 and X2. This CBN illustrates the concept of causal relationships and is used to provide examples of calculating probabilities in Bayesian Networks. The values assigned to the variables (0 or 1) represent possible states of the system, and the conditional probabilities are specified in the text associated with the figure.
Full paper#
