↗ OpenReview ↗ NeurIPS Homepage ↗ Chat
TL;DR#
Shape from Polarization (SfP) methods typically struggle with varying lighting conditions, leading to inaccurate surface normal estimations. Existing approaches often rely on controlled lighting environments or make strong assumptions about the scene, limiting their real-world applicability. Furthermore, the presence of both metallic and dielectric surfaces with varying reflection properties poses another significant challenge for accurate normal estimation.
To tackle these issues, the researchers introduce SfPUEL, an end-to-end deep learning framework. SfPUEL incorporates a transformer-based architecture to capture global context features, improving the perception of complex lighting scenarios. It also integrates pre-trained photometric stereo (PS) models to enhance feature extraction. Importantly, SfPUEL jointly estimates surface normals and material segmentation (metallic vs. dielectric), further improving accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that SfPUEL significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art SfP and single-shot normal estimation methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Key Takeaways#
Why does it matter?#
This paper is important because it significantly advances the field of shape from polarization (SfP) by addressing the limitations of existing methods. SfPUEL’s ability to work under unknown lighting conditions and its integration of photometric stereo priors are major breakthroughs. This opens up new possibilities for 3D reconstruction in various applications, improving accuracy and expanding the applicability of SfP to more real-world scenarios. The release of the accompanying code and dataset further enhances its impact, enabling researchers to build upon this work and accelerate progress in the field.
Visual Insights#
Figure 1(a) shows how the angle of linear polarization (AoLP) maps of metallic and dielectric spheres change under different lighting conditions and material types, highlighting the challenges of shape from polarization (SfP) under varying environments. Figure 1(b) demonstrates the proposed SfPUEL method’s ability to estimate surface normals from single-shot polarized images and its performance against existing state-of-the-art methods, DeepSfP and PANDORA, showing its superior shape prediction capabilities.
This table presents a quantitative comparison of the proposed SfPUEL method against several state-of-the-art SfP (Shape from Polarization) and single-image-based methods for surface normal estimation. The evaluation is performed on synthetic data and uses metrics such as angular error (mean, median, RMSE) and accuracy percentages at different angular thresholds (11.25°, 22.5°, 30.0°). Material accuracy is also included as a metric to assess the quality of material segmentation performed by SfPUEL.
In-depth insights#
SfP Under Unknown Light#
Shape from Polarization (SfP) techniques traditionally struggle under varying and uncontrolled lighting conditions. The challenge lies in the ambiguity introduced by diverse light sources, affecting the accuracy of polarization-based surface normal estimation. Research on SfP under unknown light focuses on developing robust methods that can handle the complexities of real-world scenes without the need for controlled lighting setups. This involves designing models that can effectively disentangle the effects of object geometry and material properties from the influence of ambient light. Approaches often incorporate advanced techniques like deep learning and transformer networks to capture global context and refine the estimation process. Key improvements are seen in handling the π and π/2 ambiguities inherent in SfP, which often result from mixed specular and diffuse reflections. Additionally, researchers explore ways to integrate additional information sources, such as photometric stereo (PS) priors, to enhance accuracy and robustness. The ultimate goal is to enable reliable and accurate 3D reconstruction of objects from single-shot polarization images, even in uncontrolled and dynamic environments.
Transformer-Based SfP#
The application of transformers to Shape from Polarization (SfP) presents a significant advancement, particularly in addressing the challenges posed by varying and uncontrolled lighting conditions. Traditional SfP methods often struggle with ambiguities inherent in polarization measurements, especially under complex illumination scenarios. Transformers’ ability to model long-range dependencies and capture global context is highly beneficial. This allows the network to better resolve ambiguities by integrating information from across the entire image, rather than relying solely on local features. This contextual understanding is crucial for accurately estimating surface normals and material properties. Furthermore, transformer architectures allow for efficient incorporation of additional data modalities, like photometric stereo priors or material segmentation maps, to further enhance the accuracy and robustness of the SfP estimation. The integration of these diverse data sources is a strength of this approach; leveraging existing well-established techniques, like those used in photometric stereo, to improve the estimation in a unified framework. The end-to-end nature of a transformer-based SfP system also streamlines the pipeline, potentially leading to faster and more streamlined processing for a variety of 3D reconstruction tasks.
PS Priors Integration#
The integration of photometric stereo (PS) priors is a key innovation in this SfP method. Leveraging pre-trained PS models provides a powerful way to enrich feature representations for improved normal estimation. This is particularly important in challenging scenarios with unknown lighting conditions because PS models implicitly encode understanding of light-object interactions. By fusing information from a pre-trained PS model with polarization cues, the network gains access to complementary information that helps to resolve ambiguities and improve accuracy. The choice of using SDM-UniPS as the source of PS priors is strategic, given its strong performance in natural light conditions; therefore, this approach transfers some of this robustness to the SfP model. However, careful consideration should be given to the fusion mechanism. The method uses a novel DoLP cross-attention block to combine PS and polarization features effectively. This fusion strategy is vital in handling situations where polarization cues might be weak or noisy, allowing the network to rely on the strong priors from PS when needed. The effectiveness of this integration is clearly demonstrated in the results section, highlighting the crucial role of PS priors in achieving state-of-the-art performance.
Material Segmentation#
The concept of ‘Material Segmentation’ within the context of a polarization-based shape and normal estimation system is crucial. Accurate material identification (metallic vs. dielectric) significantly improves the accuracy of surface normal estimation because different materials exhibit distinct polarization behaviors. The algorithm likely leverages the polarization properties, such as the Angle of Linear Polarization (AoLP) and Degree of Linear Polarization (DoLP), to discriminate between metallic and dielectric surfaces. This likely involves training a model to recognize patterns within the polarization data that correlate with material properties, potentially incorporating spectral information. A successful material segmentation step reduces ambiguity and noise in the normal estimation process. The segmentation mask aids in refining the subsequent surface normal estimation, allowing the system to generate more accurate 3D models. The integration of material segmentation with surface normal and shape estimation showcases a holistic approach to 3D reconstruction, improving the overall accuracy and robustness, especially in challenging scenarios with complex lighting and material combinations. Jointly estimating material properties and surface normals likely leads to a more accurate and detailed 3D reconstruction, making it suitable for various applications.
SfPUEL Limitations#
The SfPUEL method, while showing significant promise in shape from polarization (SfP), presents several limitations. Its reliance on a pre-segmented object mask is a notable constraint, limiting its applicability to scenarios where such masks are readily available. The method’s performance degrades on surfaces with complex microstructures, such as rough stone or fabric, as these materials tend to depolarize reflected light, hindering accurate polarization cue extraction. Similarly, overexposed image regions can affect polarization cues, leading to estimation errors. While the use of synthetic data aids in training, the limited availability of real-world, high-quality polarized datasets with varied illumination and materials remains a factor that could limit the generalizability of SfPUEL to diverse, uncontrolled settings. Finally, the performance on metallic objects is not comprehensively explored, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential refinements. Addressing these limitations is critical to advancing the method’s robustness and broad applicability in real-world SfP scenarios.
More visual insights#
More on figures
This figure shows the architecture of the proposed SfPUEL network. It consists of two main parts: Pol&PS Feature Extractor and Global Context Extractor. The Pol&PS Feature Extractor takes as input the AoLP and DoLP maps, image intensities, polarization images, and the object mask. It has two parallel branches: the polarization feature extraction module (PolFEM) and the photometric stereo prior extraction module (PSPEM), which encode information from polarization and photometric stereo, respectively. The DoLP cross-attention block fuses features from these two modules. The Global Context Extractor adopts the image-level and pixel-level attention mechanisms to generate the global context features. Finally, the network predicts material segmentation and surface normals.
This figure shows the detailed architecture of the DoLP cross-attention block used in the SfPUEL network. The block fuses features from the polarization feature extraction module (PolFEM) and the photometric stereo prior extraction module (PSPEM). It uses the Degree of Linear Polarization (DoLP) to generate a mask, focusing the network’s attention on high-fidelity polarization cues and suppressing unreliable information, especially in low DoLP regions.
This figure shows the experimental setup used to collect the real-world dataset for the SfPUEL method. A polarization camera and a panoramic camera are used to capture images of six different objects under varying lighting conditions. The panoramic camera captures the environment lighting, which is then used as input to the SfPUEL model, along with the polarization images, to estimate surface normals and material properties. The objects include both metallic and dielectric materials to test the model’s robustness and generalization ability under complex lighting scenarios.
This figure shows a qualitative comparison of the model’s performance on synthetic data. It displays input images, the model’s prediction for material segmentation (metallic vs. dielectric), and the model’s prediction for surface normal estimation, alongside ground truth for both material and surface normal. The results visually demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in accurately segmenting materials and estimating surface normals in various scenarios.
This figure compares the performance of the proposed SfPUEL method against several state-of-the-art methods for surface normal estimation using synthetic data. The top row shows results for a boat model, while the bottom row shows results for a more complex, humanoid model. Each image shows a color-coded visualization of the surface normals estimated by each method. The numbers below each image indicate the mean angular error, a quantitative measure of the accuracy of the surface normal estimation.
This figure displays a qualitative comparison of surface normal estimation results on real-world data. Several state-of-the-art methods (SfPW, DeepSfP, One-2-3-45, UNE, DSINE) are compared against the proposed SfPUEL method. The ground truth normal map is also shown for reference. The mean angular error for each method’s prediction is provided below the corresponding normal map visualization. This allows for a visual assessment of the accuracy and detail captured by each method.
This figure shows a qualitative comparison of the ablation study results on two objects: a metallic KETTLE and a dielectric ROOSTER. It visually demonstrates the effect of removing different components of the SfPUEL model, such as the PS priors, the polarization encoder, the material estimation module, and the DoLP cross-attention block. Each column represents the output normal maps for a specific ablation, and the last column shows the ground truth normal map for comparison. By comparing the results, we can understand the contribution of each component to the final performance.
This figure shows qualitative results from the SfPUEL method on objects with rough surfaces. The top row shows a piece of fabric, and the bottom row shows a turtle figurine. Each row presents the input image, the estimated surface normal (as a color-coded map), the degree of linear polarization (DoLP), and the angle of linear polarization (AoLP). The DoLP and AoLP are represented as heatmaps illustrating how these polarization properties vary across the surface. The results demonstrate the method’s performance when dealing with complex surface textures.
The figure compares the appearance and polarization properties (AoLP and DoLP) of three synthetic spheres: a dielectric sphere with white diffuse albedo, a dielectric sphere with black diffuse albedo, and a metallic sphere made of chromium. All spheres share the same refractive index (RI) and roughness but differ in their albedo and the presence of extinction coefficient (EC) for the metallic sphere. The images show that the color and AoLP/DoLP patterns of the spheres vary significantly depending on their material properties, which highlights the importance of considering material type when estimating surface normals from polarization images.
This figure shows the experimental setup for capturing the real-world dataset. It consists of six objects with diverse shapes, colors, and materials (metallic and dielectric). A panoramic camera captures the environment lighting condition, which is then used to render the synthetic data, for each object. The polarization camera, mounted on a stand, is used to capture polarization images of each object in turn. These images, along with the environment light information, form the basis of the real-world dataset used to evaluate the proposed method.
This figure shows a qualitative comparison of material estimation results of the proposed SfPUEL method on synthetic data. The input shows a set of images of different objects. The SfPUEL material column displays the material segmentation results predicted by the model, where red indicates dielectric materials and green indicates metallic materials. The GT material column shows the ground truth material segmentation. The SfPUEL normal and GT normal columns show the surface normal estimation results and ground truth surface normals, respectively. The figure demonstrates the ability of the SfPUEL method to accurately segment and predict both dielectric and metallic materials.
This figure demonstrates the challenges of shape from polarization (SfP) under varying environmental lighting conditions. (a) shows how the angle of linear polarization (AoLP) maps change significantly for metallic and dielectric spheres under different lighting. (b) showcases the effectiveness of the proposed SfPUEL method in accurately predicting surface normals from single-shot polarized images under unknown lighting conditions, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods.
This figure shows a qualitative comparison of the ablation study results on two objects: KETTLE (metallic) and ROOSTER (dielectric). It compares the performance of SfPUEL against several variants, demonstrating the impact of different components and design choices on the overall accuracy. The results visualize the surface normal estimations for each variant, showcasing the effects of removing modules such as the PS priors, the Polarization Feature Extraction Module (PolFEM), the DoLP cross-attention mechanism, material estimation and polarization encoding.
This figure compares the performance of SfPUEL against several state-of-the-art methods for surface normal estimation on real-world data. It shows the input image and the estimated normal maps produced by each method. The numbers below each normal map represent the mean angular error, a quantitative metric of accuracy.
This figure compares the qualitative results of the proposed SfPUEL method with several state-of-the-art methods for surface normal estimation from real-world data. It visually demonstrates the superiority of SfPUEL in accurately estimating surface normals, especially compared to methods that rely solely on RGB images or other single-view techniques. The mean angular error is provided below each normal map for quantitative comparison.
More on tables
This table presents a quantitative comparison of different methods for surface normal estimation on both a real-world dataset and the PANDORA dataset. The methods compared include SfPW, DeepSfP, UNE, DSINE, and the proposed SfPUEL method. The evaluation metrics include mean angular error, median angular error, root mean square error (RMSE), and accuracy percentages at different angular thresholds (11.25°, 22.5°, and 30.0°). The results show the relative performance of each method on both datasets, highlighting SfPUEL’s improved accuracy compared to other methods.
This table presents the results of an ablation study conducted on a real-world dataset to evaluate the impact of different components of the SfPUEL model. The metrics used are mean, median, and RMSE of angular error, as well as accuracy percentages at different angular thresholds (11.25°, 22.5°, and 30.0°). By systematically removing different parts of the model, the table shows how each component contributes to the overall performance.
This table compares the model size (number of parameters) and inference time of different methods, including SfPW, DeepSfP, One-2-3-45, UNE, DSINE, and SfPUEL. The results show the model size and inference time for each method, demonstrating the computational cost associated with each.
This table details the architecture of the polarization encoder within the PolFEM module of the SfPUEL model. It breaks down each layer, including convolutional layers, activation functions (SiLU, ReLU), and linear layers. The output tensor size for each layer is also provided, showing how the dimensions change throughout the encoder. Finally, it specifies the output size of the normal-MLP and material-MLP prediction heads.
Full paper#
